Compact refrigerators aren’t always the energy-efficient choice

Compact Refrigerators Are Not Energy EfficientIn "Greens Gone Wild! These Folks Have Turned Their Back on Refrigerators," we reported on a New York Times story about energy-conscious individuals who have stopped using their refrigerator or given up their full-size model.

One of those profiled in the Times' article stores her food in a compact refrigerator instead of a full-size model. While that might sound like a good energy-saving move, it's not necessarily a smart decision because compact refrigerators are not particularly efficient for their size.

In our latest report, we found that while tall compact refrigerators got higher energy-efficiency scores than shorter ones, these appliances typically use a lot of energy for the storage space they provide.

We also noted that some compact refrigerators consume almost as much electricity as a full-size refrigerator. The Frigidaire FRC05L5D[B] (shown) has a claimed capacity of only 4.6 cubic feet and will cost about $38 on average to run each year; its EnergyGuide label says it will use 348 kilowatt hours annually. But for about $6 and 59 kWh more per year, you could run the Kenmore 7787[2] top-freezer we've tested, which has a claimed capacity of 18 cubic feet. The up-front cost of a full-size refrigerator will be higher, of course.—Kimberly Janeway

Essential information: Check out our Energy-Saving Guide for more advice.

Written by larrylarr on February 13th, 2009 with no comments.
Read more articles on news.

Related articles

No comments

There are still no comments on this article.

Leave your comment...

If you want to leave your comment on this article, simply fill out the next form:




You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> .